ZENIT - The World Seen From Rome 2005-12-16
Countering the Myth of the Perfect Child
Bioethics Courses Focus on "Neonatal Euthanasia" and Other Problems
ROME, DEC. 16, 2005 (Zenit.org).- Dr. Gerard Brungardt learned an unsettling fact when he came to Italy for an intensive weeklong course on bioethics.
The palliative care specialist from Wichita, Kansas, was surprised to learn that the average Italian woman has 12 sonograms during her pregnancy.
"It indicates our current fear of the non-perfect child," Brungardt said, "for which Dr. Bellieni has coined the term 'handiphobia' -- fear of the handicapped, the risks and realities of in vitro fertilization, embryo adoption, and neonatal/infant euthanasia."
He was referring to Dr. Carlo Bellieni, a neonatologist from Siena and self-described "fetus doctor" who teaches "The Myth of the Perfect Child" course during the week of studies at the Regina Apostolorum athenaeum's School of Bioethics.
A recurring theme in the many anecdotes Bellieni told his class of 80 students was how often parents reduce children to objects.
"We saw in this class how the child is no longer loved unconditionally and respected as a human person," said Dr. Laura Nino, a medical researcher from Houston, Texas, who participated in the course. Rather, the child is sometimes "seen as an object of possession which parents can dispose of when he or she falls short of their expectations," she added.
Amniocentesis
That sense of high expectations in parents can even lead to the death of perfectly healthy children in the womb.
Bellieni cited the example of prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome and the proliferation of the use of amniocentesis. That surgical procedure involves inserting a hollow needle through the abdominal wall into the uterus of a pregnant woman and extracting amniotic fluid, which may be analyzed to determine the sex of the developing fetus, or the presence of disease or genetic defects.
"A healthy fetus dies for every 200 amniocenteses done which, for 35-year-old woman, is about the same risk as having a Down syndrome child," observed Bellieni.
"This means that in order to eliminate one Down syndrome child, we accept the risk of the death of another innocent child as an adverse effect of the amniocentesis," he said.
Bellieni sees a deeper problem lurking behind the overuse of amniocentesis and the widespread tolerance of abortion. That problem touches on interpersonal relations and even self-image, all of which he talks of in almost philosophical language.
"I" of the storm
"Most fundamentally, we cannot say 'I' anymore because saying 'I' would mean that we have found someone who has called us by name and loved us only because we exist, not because of our utility," Bellieni contended.
"This loss of the capacity to say 'I' leads to our loss of the capacity to say 'You' to the fetus," he added. "We do not love ourselves anymore and therefore we cannot love others. We see others, including the fetus, as a means and not as the end they truly are. One of the consequences of this outlook would be neonatal euthanasia."
"The Myth of the Perfect Child" is only one of several bioethics courses offered recently at Regina Apostolorum. The weeklong courses are offered twice each semester, and once during the summer to accommodate non-traditional students working toward degrees in bioethics.
Now in its fifth year, the athenaeum's School of Bioethics boasts 350 students from 30 countries. Lay people -- including politicians and health-care professionals -- study side by side with religious.
One of the invited guest speakers for next April's intensive courses is Dr. Edmund Pellegrino, the new chairman of the President's Council on Bioethics in the United States. More information about the courses is posted at www.upra.org or available via bioethics@upra.com.
Among those who came to Rome this year to deepen their knowledge of science -- and the faith -- was Jennifer Miller of New York.
"Coming from Fordham University," she said, "I saw that scientists get so desensitized that they forget what they are really doing. There is a need to re-humanize science with a focus on human dignity."
ZENIT home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
We can start a School of Community here on my blog if y'all would like. I'll post a couple of the fundamental articles of CL in the next couple of days, and we can discuss them.
Or we can keep talking about original sin and Bob Dylan.
Or both. : )
Let me know what you think.
LOL ;-)
That sounds fun to me.
I think those two have outworn their fruitfulness, so we'd better move on to something else.
Other than the fact that your dad being on ZENIT is just awesome, this article provides a nice opportunity to talk about materialistic utilitarianism.
Man has lost his sense of value of the human person. Human beings are no longer seen as immortal beings created by an act of love on the part of God, but rather as objects to be used for the advantage of the stronger. As a culture we are obsessed with efficiency and usefulness to the point that we destroy the individual and make him purely a cog in a machine.
In his 1986 encyclical, Solicitudo Rei Socialis, Pope John Paul II said, "But at the same time man must remain subject to the will of God, who imposes limits upon his use and dominion over things (cf. Gen 2:16-17), just as he promises his mortality (cf. Gen 2:9; Wis 2:23). Thus man, being the image of God, has a true affinity with him too. On the basis of this teaching, development cannot consist only in the use, dominion over and indiscriminate possession of created things and the products of human industry, but rather in subordinating the possession, dominion and use to man's divine likeness and to his vocation to immortality. This is the transcendent reality of the human being, a reality which is seen to be shared from the beginning by a couple, a man and a woman (cf. Gen 1:27), and is therefore fundamentally social."
This obsession with utility reminds me of the dawn of Communist totalitarianism which advocates the same sort of "cog in a machine" type of treatment of the human person. Pope Pius XI said in 1937, in Divini Redemptoris; "Communism, moreover, strips man of his liberty, robs human personality of all its dignity, and removes all the moral restraints that check the eruptions of blind impulse. There is no recognition of any rights of the individual in his relation to the collectivity; no natural right is accorded to human personality, which is a mere cog-wheel in the Communist system."
Does this explain why pregnant women insist on obtaining amniocentesis procedures in order to ascertain whether or not their children's lives will be worth living? Can we, in our system of sophisticated Western Capitalism, claim to be any better than the Bolsheviks?
Before anyone says there's nothing new under the sun, I realize that the Spartans did exactly the same thing, just bear in mind that Sparta was a pre-Christian culture, so what we have is a regression back into a pagan darkness.
ok, I'm done. ;-)
In Christ, John H.
Post a Comment